I don't have any problem with file sizes above 5 MB (?!) and I don't need anyone making that decision for me. 50 MB would be fine. 100 MB would be fine. And if size was ever an issue, I can easily reduce image quality on my own. I just feel like it should be my choice. I don't email my reports, I provide a download link. This is 2015, not 1995. The thing with digital images is that once you reduce the resolution, you can never get it back. I'd like the option to produce a PDF as large as I want. I want to provide the highest quality product and most useful information possible to my clients. They are paying me good money and they deserve a report that knocks their socks off. To me, a file size of 5 MB is a joke. That is less than the size of one full resolution photo. Those pixels that are lost are information. Visual information about my clients' homes which is lost as soon as the photo quality is reduced. When you say the client doesn't even know what they are looking at, which is an insulting comment to begin with, you should perhaps consider that if we could provide them with higher resolution photos then we could better inform them about their homes. PDF is a wonderful format that can contain high resolution photos. Most of our clients read their reports with sophisticated devices with high resolution screens that are capable of rendering images beautifully. A picture says a thousand words, and we live in a world driven by digital images. I'd like to take advantage of all this inexpensive, amazing, easy to use technology.
