Welcome,
Guest
|
|
Have an idea and whant to know if anyone has done this, or if will mess things up in the program.
Since we have to report on materials and I also include "functioned normally at time of inspection" (FNATOI)when it applies here is my idea to speed up the data entry time. 1) Create a report w/out client info 2) Select FNATOI for all components 3) Select common materials (ie. Plumbing - copper, Waste PVC: Electric - Breakers/conduit: Interior - Drywall, etc) 4) Save report as "field notes" (or something like that) 5) When inputing data for an actual inspection - open the "field notes" inspection and save as "clients inspection" 6) Input additional/changed data into "clients inspection" Anyone try this? Essentially I'd default everything to FNATOI and change it as needed. Would I loose my "field notes" report if I save it as a different name? TIA |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
|
Problem is that you'd lose any new narratives since saving the template would never affect the 'field notes' report as it would maintain its own template.
I do have a feature on the to-do list to allow comments to be pre-selected on a template though. |
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Dominic Maricic
Home Inspector Pro Home Inspection Software - CEO |
|
Could I save it as both? First as client report, then feild notes?
**added** hmmm...gues that would kinda defeat the puropse. |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
|
If you really want to save time you could put all material comments into one section and leave all the rest for defects only.
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
|
How's that working for you Bob? Did you get a template done that works that way. I know you were working on it.
|
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Dominic Maricic
Home Inspector Pro Home Inspection Software - CEO |
|
That's not really what I was going for. I was looking to have them pre-selected, so i dont have to click on the materials at all. I look forward th the "pre-selected feature" |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |